home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Light ROM 4
/
Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso
/
text
/
net_news
/
1994
/
1.doc
/
000228_csznml@scs.leeds.ac.uk_Fri Nov 25 12:05:01 PST 1994.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1995-03-23
|
1KB
|
38 lines
Article: 232 of comp.graphics.packages.lightwave
Xref: netcom.com comp.graphics.packages.lightwave:232
Newsgroups: comp.graphics.packages.lightwave
Path: netcom.com!ix.netcom.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!pipex!uknet!festival!leeds.ac.uk!news
From: csznml@scs.leeds.ac.uk (N M Lines)
Subject: Re: LW's on a 2000
Message-ID: <1994Nov25.145148.13996@leeds.ac.uk>
Sender: news@leeds.ac.uk
NNTP-Posting-Host: csgi18.leeds.ac.uk
Organization: The University of Leeds, School of Computer Studies
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 1994 14:51:47 +0000 (GMT)
References: <3b4664$oce@odin.community.net>
Lines: 22
sundance@solano.community.net (Stephen W. Laminack) writes:
>I have a Amiga 2000 with 030/40 Mhz. 9 megs ram (1 chip 8 fast). Am I
>going to be limited or have trouble running LW standalone on this system?
>I know it's close to the low end of the needs but for now the system is
>simple to learn LW's and upgrade to a better 4000 system after I know my
>way around LW and can do graphics work to pay for upgrade.
Ads in UK magazines say that Lightwave *needs* 2MB of chip memory. This may
be less on an NTSC screen (less lines) but you may still need a lot of
chip-mem.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
>
>Thanks
>
>Stephen
>
--
nik.// "ATM APL/1 tells the UNI/NNI to set CBR VCx with VPI/VCI" - M Kara
\X/ Jovanovic Paradigm : csznml@scs.leeds.ac.uk